The Practical Charts BOOK will be available on Nov. 15!

 
 

At embarrassingly long last, I’m relieved to announce that the Practical Charts book is finished! The book will be released on November 15th, with pre-orders beginning in a week or two.

The goal of the book is as ambitious as the course on which it’s based: to teach chart creators of any experience level to create expert-level charts in just a few days. Given how many common data visualization challenges and mistakes need to be tackled to accomplish that, it was a tall order to keep the book down to 300 pages, but, flipping through the advance copies that I just giddily unwrapped, I think it might actually deliver. You tell me, though, when you read the book (you’re gonna read it, right?). More details about the book can be found on the official Practical Charts book page.

There will be more book-related announcements in the coming weeks, so make sure you’re subscribed to my email list to be notified when…

  • Pre-orders can be placed so you get the book shipped to you automatically on the release date (you might even get an extra goodie or two from me if you let me know that you pre-ordered it).

  • Bulk orders for team leaders and educators are available (which will be before November 15th).

  • Free advance reviewer copies can be requested (we’ll be sending out a limited number of free advance reviewer copies so that there are reviews on Amazon when the book is released).

  • Sneak peeks of content from the book are released.

Also, make sure you're subscribed to my email list if you’re interested in becoming a “VIP Reader” of the book. WTH is a “VIP Reader”? Well, VIP Readers will receive perks such as preferential consideration when requests for free advance reviewer copies of the book are being considered, and access to private “ask me anything” Zoom group calls just for VIP Readers. In exchange, I’ll be asking VIP Readers to pre-order the book (so that Amazon’s algorithms quickly learn who to show the book to), then post a review on Amazon and chat up the book on their social media channels when the book is released in November. Interested? Awesome! I expect to put out the call for VIP Readers in one to two weeks via my email list.

Connected scatterplots make me feel dumb. (article in Nightingale)

Connected scatterplots are sometimes used to show how two variables are related over time. In my latest article for Nightingale (the journal of the Data Visualization Society), I argue that connected scatterplot are virtually never the best choice, and alternatives like stacked line charts and indexed line charts can communicate the same insights as connected scatterplots, but are much easier to read and less prone to misinterpretation.

Read more

There are no bad chart types... Right?

There are about a dozen chart types that I don’t recommend using for “everyday” charts in reports and presentations, such as bullet graphs and box plots. Some people are uncomfortable with the idea of saying that a given chart type is never the most effective choice, however. In this blog post, I argue that there’s no reason to think that, for every chart type, there must be situations in which it’s the most effective choice, and that it’s entirely possible that some chart types are never the most effective choice.

Read more

Should you learn dataviz theory?

Occasionally, I come across a claim on social media that, in order to become truly competent at dataviz, you need to know about theoretical concepts such as graphical objects, encoding channels, and preattentive attributes of visual perception.

Is that true, though? Or can you still create effective charts without knowing about those theoretical concepts?

Read more

Choosing a chart type is harder than you think

Many chart creators assume that choosing a chart type is an easy decision that can be made using simple rules of thumb like, "Use line charts to show data over time." Unfortunately, these rules of thumb are too simplistic and often lead to poor chart type choices, and making a good chart type choice usually requires taking at least six or eight factors into consideration.

Read more

Will AI automate data visualization?

As pretty much everyone and their robot dog is now aware, there are jaw-dropping breakthroughs happening in artificial intelligence (AI) on an almost daily basis. To those of us in the data visualization field, this begs the obvious question: Will AIs be able to create expert-level charts without any human intervention, and, if so, when might that happen?

Read more

"I'm using data storytelling, but my charts are still poorly received. Why?"​

Unfortunately, there seems to be a widespread belief that a lack of data storytelling is always the main—or possibly only—reason why charts and data presentations don’t go over well with audiences, and that turning charts and data presentations into “data stories” virtually guarantees that they’ll be effective and well received. Even though that view isn’t promoted by most data storytelling thought leaders, it seems to have taken hold among many data professionals anyway.

Read more

How many bins should my histogram have?

Choosing how many bins to include in a histogram can be a tricky design decision. There are many articles out there that recommend algorithms or rules of thumb for calculating the “optimal” number of bins, however, I don’t think that any calculation can do this reliably. In this post, I argue that the “optimal” number of bins depends mostly on the specific insight that needs to be communicated about the data, and not on the nature of the data (number of values, standard deviation of the values, etc.)

Read more

The biggest misconception in data visualization

When designing a chart, most people try to come up with the ‘best way to visualize the data’. This often results in charts that are unobvious or useless to readers, though. Instead, we should try to design charts that best answer a specific question or that best communicate a specific insight about the data, even though such charts don’t answer all questions that readers might have about the data.

Read more

I’ve Stopped Using Box Plots. Should You?

I've recently published an article in the Data Visualization Society's excellent Nightingale publication, entitled "I've Stopped Using Box Plots. Should You?" A brief summary:

After having explained how to read box plots to thousands of workshop participants, I now believe that they’re poorly conceived (box plots, not workshop participants ;-) ), which makes this classic chart type unnecessarily unintuitive, hard to grasp, and prone to misinterpretation. This has caused innumerable distribution-based insights to fail to land with audiences who weren’t willing or able to grasp them. Alternative chart types are virtually always easier to learn how to read, more informative, or both.

Want to read the full, heretical article? It's now available on the Nightingale site.

Read more